Peer Review

One forms beliefs through iterations that hold.
So it is I find a recent Canadian study suspiciously likely - I could fill this commentary with other examples not necerssarily Canadian - to be more indicative of crypto-paedophiles covering themselves. Charitably it could can simply be spelt out as the effects of social bias resulting in apprehendable offenders in a certain category being of the same human type, however the dutiful scientists have decided that it is most likely due to pregnancy exposures.
It's clod science so typical of too much science.
Canada has a history of near-nazi like abuse of some of its citizens, if you care to hunt it down.
I reiterate the opening assertion.