Far away, so close

I got hit - thru negligence - by a nasty program in the Ubuntu I use offline. So there went the first Rorty essay draft. rumour - confirmed by more than anecdote - makes it difficult to ascribe a single intention to the attack. A rarely act on a single reason myself.

Anyway I've wondered why I didn't feel comfortable with Yahoo, and now I know. The boss, a spirited guy to be sure, likes Sumo. My Sumerazure at Yahoo 360 will be largely abandoned, except for the excellent Launchcast which I'd like to bring in to my other spots on web. I should explain that HAN01 is my rogue sub-genius persona, and sure to bring bad-luck to any that assume it's identity. From here-on han01 will only appear from cielnoir@bigstring.com. Any other han01 are not from this source, as many surely have not been.

Presently I am increasingly shocked by the UK governmemnt deportation policy, which (together with much else in policy) is not only repulsive cultural relativism at it's most right wing, but is also an indicator of the future that the UK population have surrendered to.
Similar fixation of peculiar reasoning is that of the pro-animal experimentation moves. Both courses are not being rejected by European courts (national or EU) so far. Such experiments are worthless acts of cruelty by a scientific tradition that should be defunct. My judgement is similar on the politicians -in the UK cabinet- who got that twisted idea that good for country is encouraging the production of things that fall short of what is needed.

yes, pollutants surely do incur left-handedness/ambidextrousness. I am right -handed, though I like to use my feet (now under exercised) and did teach my left hand to function as well as my right.

Later, adios.

Moving along

So there's more interesting stuff to addend that last item, though the sum of it if they've got a point about pollutants would be NO OIL extraction or else North America down wind of the shale tundra will have.....

Meanwhile I'll try get back to the general drift of things in this blog. I've been re-reading Rorty (Richard) - used to read quite often - and developing the themes where I've found I disagree with him. I was quite pained to see he had died, his writing got me someways clued into Philosophy, though, as ever, I was overly delayed in getting round to the study. Mournful life sometimes.

Peer Review

One forms beliefs through iterations that hold.
So it is I find a recent Canadian study suspiciously likely - I could fill this commentary with other examples not necerssarily Canadian - to be more indicative of crypto-paedophiles covering themselves. Charitably it could can simply be spelt out as the effects of social bias resulting in apprehendable offenders in a certain category being of the same human type, however the dutiful scientists have decided that it is most likely due to pregnancy exposures.
It's clod science so typical of too much science.
Canada has a history of near-nazi like abuse of some of its citizens, if you care to hunt it down.
I reiterate the opening assertion.

remarking of clouds ( and I'd urge some of you (who can)to visit thereversecowgirl blog). I was reading Does god play dice by I Stewart, two years ago I was reading Philip Ball's Critical Mass, recently. There's a parallel, as the weather has decided so much in history, between fractalisation of clouds/precipitate and the way humans en mass behave? How would that be? Who cares? What difference would it make? It may make for a fairly unforced agreement that we shouldn't so much massing. I wonder if Ecclesiastes reads more like "one should not behave as a cloud", after all "observe" is wide ranging word in English. Can anyone tell me from maybe a Jewish angle?

error

I'm here writing when I meant to go somewhere else to say the same thing. I know there was going to be a piece on how things are constructed simply because they can be. Maybe we should think of all that isn't constructed because it cannot be. How are things not being?

The Allosteric essayed soon.

(onomastics and avian) Origins in disguise/sacred

There is this anywhere. It charts no longer so much the seasons -which, I wonder, were ever fashion decades sustained as centuries rewite longevious styles - as the skies' dances on the core rooves.
How much in how many phrases? I don't hear much detail so much as I see in the buildings, the vehicled, the clothed; who talks watching the road or dual screens the view. The tlakers reveals nothing as (any) category except a definite perogative to knowledge.
More is said by a lady work clothed though unable to hide the committemnt to her body, or the worker whose bitterness, given a service mask home-made, is written thru error the lawyer prays for.

The factory vernaculars in architecture works it's own negation from the diversity of responses to the diminished availability of biological familiars? This rapacity at the carmine cubes, their amber ashen surfaces the colour of summer slaughter clouds rashing of temptation succumbed to on any skin.

The wildlife has it's exodae from drought, claiming a world where the rains meet its tempered mineral pointing filigreed of gesticulatory revelations inseperable from the human in astringent recognitions.
Consider nothing parallels the variations of the human specie as the art of shape and shade in clouds. What language takes apart our senses marry. Yet the contrary is true beyond the indo-european foliage?